Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Kate Hoey MP will attend Vauxhall Cross discussion on 9th December

Please be advised that the next public meeting of the Kennington, Oval, Vauxhall (KOV) Forum will take place on the 9th December 2014 at 7pm at the Carmelita Centre (Registration from 6:30pm).

The main item on the Agenda will be the 'Vauxhall Cross' latest developments and associated consultation (more information on

Kate Hoey MP will be attending this public meeting.

A full detail Agenda will be issued soon. In the meantime keep checking the KOV Forum website, Facebook and twitter for the latest updates.

Tuesday, 25 November 2014

Road Safety messengers have to change their spots

It was the easiest thing in the world for a Road Safety Officer to blag a pile of high viz landfill from a company that realised spending 3s 6d on tat is cheaper than spending proper money sorting out their drivers and vehicles, and it fulfilled their role as a cheap sop to politicians who couldn't care less for people walking and cycling.

But those days need to be put behind us. In London, at least, the active traveller  should absolutely not need to kowtow to the motorist.

Let's remind ourselves for the umpteenth time why:
1) 60% of London car journeys only have the driver in the car, squandering the capacity of valuable road space. It's a dumb way to move lots of people around, especially when half of all car journeys in London are under 3kms - a distance so easy to cycle or walk for the vast majority.

2) A third of men aged 35 to 65 are too fat to be able to see their penis. They need to build exercise into their daily routine, easiest done by travelling. (Apart from not being to see their best friend, they're more likely to develop diabetes, heart disease and cancer).

3) 6 out of 10 London households don't have a car, and getting on for half of outer London households don't either.

4) Cars pump out CO2 and exhaust emissions. It's bad for the planet and bad for us - there'll be 50,000 premature deaths due to poor air quality this year and each year we continue.

5) motor vehicles have a shudderingly high amount of kinetic energy compared to the pedestrian or cyclist, and a driver therefore has a hugely disproportionate likelihood to cause serious injury or death.

Okay, enough already. It's blindingly obvious that promoting walking and cycling is the way to go for urban trips, and we're not going to achieve that if we take every opportunity to portray cycling as an incredibly dangerous activity.

I mean, look at this recent image of training for riding on local streets, published in the Western Gazette - does it encourage parents to let their children cycle around their neighbourhood?

By all means take sensible measures to have cyclists use lights as nights. For example, like the Germans historically, you ensure lights are built into bicycles, with dynamo lighting, so they're always present, in the right place, and reliable.

Control the speeds and access of motor vehicles. Adopt the Dutch method of sustainable safety, based on the proven principal that a 21 year old male is a nutter for reasons well beyond their own control.

And focus your road safety attention on the vehicles with the greater kinetic energy.

And if you watch this you'll see why I went on this rant this evening. A really good beginning for change would be for the BBC and other media to agree a code of conduct that ensures road safety messages are not at the expense of promoting active travel.

If you want to read more I suggest you start with the Road Danger Reduction Forum

Sunday, 23 November 2014

A very short blog on cycle proofing

The Cycling Delivery Plan published last week for consultation by the Department for Transport contains 13 mentions of ‘cycle proofing’

  1. 1.
    able to withstand something damaging; resistant.

Water proof - designed to hold off water

Cycle proof - designed to enable cyclists to get through.


Calling Lambeth and beyond - your photos wanted

Cllr. Jenny Brathwaite, Lambeth's Cabinet Member for Environment and Sustainability, gave a powerful speech at yesterday's Cyclenation conference in our Town Hall.

She told the room full of cycling campaigners that she is not a cyclist and outlined a few of the reasons. They included
1. The images of cycling in the media are of sporty cycling or portray it as dangerous. There is no suggestion that cycling is an 'everyman, everyday' activity

.Photo from today's 'Health and Families' section of the Independent

Photo from yesterday's Western Gazette press article yesterday about training children to cycle on their local roads

2. The overwhelming message is 'You come onto the roads at your peril'.

Jenny reflected that, "like walking, cycling we learnt to do as children, but we give up on cycling" and was clear that, "We need to make cycling an everyday, mundane and safe activity. Lambeth has a major role to play in normalising cycling. Pedestrians and cyclists must be at the very heart of our borough".

She was clear also about the scale of the challenge, stating that "she had been taken aback by the number of residents who are so very attached to their cars."

A little later on Brian Deegan from TfL outlined the new London Cycling Design Standards. Like the Netherlands, segregation will be on roads with high volumes/speeds of motor traffic, but back streets will be shared by motor vehicles and bicycles.

On Saturday 29th November there will be a ‘Made in Lambeth’ event where a disparate bunch of people come together to design a website about cycling in Lambeth. There is no point in having the website stuffed full of photos like those above if Lambeth is to follow its cycling strategy to make:
Lambeth the most cycle-friendly borough in London where 1- 100 year olds feel safe enough to cycle.
Equally there's no point in stuffing a Lambeth website full of photos like the one below (from a recent Swindon Advertiser) when the reality is that the children cycling to school on their bikes are expected to mix with traffic.

So I'm on the search for photos of ordinary people in Lambeth - children, hand-cyclists, the elderly. The kinds of images I am looking for can be seen scrolling down here except that I am looking for the equivalent on motor-trafficked inner London streets.

I want photos of
-       People (especially children) making cycle trips on their own or with friends in inner London traffic with private cars and commercial vehicles such as taxis and delivery/trades vans.
-       Utility rather than leisure trips (Morning cycle to school time, shopping, commuting).
-       Different seasons and also at dusk/night and day, rain and sun.
-       The cyclists and drivers looking relaxed and the cyclist(s) generally in primary position (approx. centre of lane).
-       These cyclists in moving and queuing traffic.

 If you've got photos you can provide (ideally with permission to use as website content) please email them to or tweet to @kenningtonpob

I've had a rummage through some of my photos and come up with these as indicative of the kind of cycling we should be representing on the website. What do you think?

Monday, 17 November 2014

Acid test time for Vauxhall, the Elephant and Castle, Superhighways and Quietways

"Lambeth will be the most cycle-friendly borough in London where 1- 100 year olds feel safe enough to cycle", Southwark wants "Stress free cycling for everyone" ....; and in 2012 Boris answered:

There are more road changes in this area being consulted on, or imminent, than you can shake a stick at.  Just look at this map: cycle superhighways in blue, Quietways in Green, Junction redesigns in black, the Vauxhall gyratory, and I'm sure there's more.

Alongside this, Southwark should have a 20mph limit on its roads within six months, while Lambeth is also on target to become a 20mph borough.

The acid test of these measures is whether they're done well enough for parents to encourage their children to cycle around this area - to school, to see their friends, to the South Bank, to Vauxhall City Farm, to the new swimming pool at Elephant and Castle; to Tate Britain and the Imperial War Museum, over the bridges to Westminster.

Some of the designs I've seen are, I think, good enough in parts to think that it will happen. And some frankly aren't yet. We know that one weak link in a route or a grid is likely to mean people won't let their children use it.

So it's absolutely crucial to respond to consultations demanding schemes that are so good that the designers will happily let their ten (or 100) year olds ride on them; and we've got to remind politicians of their policies and make sure they hold firm by them.

Here's a list of consultations I know of. Please get involved, with positive suggestions for improvements where you can, but at least take the time to simply demand that the final design is child as well as commuter friendly.

The consultation on changes to CS7 at the Kennington Road and Oval junctions has ended;
The consultation has ended for a Cycling Superhighway running north from the E&C over Blackfriars Bridge; The plans for the Elephant and Castle northern roundabout are out for a (maybe) final consultation;
Southwark have consulted on their section of the new Quietway from Waterloo to Greenwich;
Lambeth will (presumably) be consulting on their bit of the Quietway;
Funding has been secured via S106 money to improve the County Hall bit of Belvedere Road;
The Vauxhall CS5 (maybe) final consultation from Oval across Vauxhall Bridge has opened;
A consultation is just starting on the future of Westminster Bridge Road ;
The Westminster Bridge South and Lambeth Bridge South junctions are scheduled for redoing in 2016
Looking towards 2018, there'll be the redoing of Vauxhall Cross (a consultation on the principles for the abolition of the Vauxhall Gyratory has just opened) and the Waterloo Imax Roundabout.
Some of this forms part of the Inner London Grid, but there may be more.

Thursday, 13 November 2014

My consultation response on DfT Cycling Delivery Plan

The plan is weak and lacks a national commitment and funding to match.

Specific items (apart from a national design and funding commitment) I
would like included are:
1. The longer term trend. Please can a graph be included showing the
historical trend in cycle trips, e.g. from 1996 when the UK’s first
National Cycling Strategy (NCS) was launched with the aim ‘to increase
cycle use’ (DoT, 1996a: 4). Its central target was to ‘double the
number of trips by cycle (on 1996 figures) by end 2002 and quadruple
the number of trips by cycle (on 1996 figures) by end of 2012’ (ibid).

This should show target and projected figures and give some reasoning
on why the targets were or were not met, and how this plan has been
protected from failure.

2. Given the aspiration for cycling levels to rival those in Germany,
Denmark and the Netherlands, please can the graph above be
extrapolated to show when, at the progress and investment rate
planned, we will meet the levels currently realised in those

3. Please can a website be maintained, quickly updated, showing which
local authorities have and have not signed up to work with the
government on the Delivery Plan.

Saturday, 8 November 2014

My consultation response on North South Cycling Superhighway

General Comments
I hugely support both the NS and EW cycle superhighways as they are essential (as part of a tightly meshed grid) to achieve the ambition of making London a city where anyone can cycle. I can see merits in the bi-directional tracks being proposed, though in general I would favour segregated tracks on each side of the road.

I question whether calculations about bus journey times have taken into account the likely mode shift by adults and children towards cycling with good infrastructure. This should mean more space on buses, decreasing journey time for some due to actually being able to board a historically full bus. In addition, more people cycling means fewer people using buses which will lessen the number of buses that need adding to the network as the population grows, benefitting motor journey time. Fewer buses than there would otherwise be, along with modal shift by car users to cycling, improve general motor traffic journey time for those who need to drive.

Detailed response -  North South Cycling Superhighway Elephant and Castle to Blackfriars
There is considerable detail and I am happy to meet a designer to clarify as needed.

While I suspect some ‘hard-core’ commuters will use the straight line of London Road rather than the dog leg of St George’s Rd / Lambeth Rd, the quality segregation and its tie-in to the revised E&C roundabout plans means that for most people, including those who daren’t currently cycle, the proposed scheme has strong benefits.

I would like to see the traffic island segregation largely planted up (see Guerilla Gardener’s Richard Reynolds’ proposal), and ways to include Sustainable Urban Drainage.

Section 1a
Is there good reason to relocate the Pelican crossing nearer Elliots Row than Oswin Street? It’s not where the major footfall alignment is, partly as it matches the side of Princess Street that has the narrow pavement.

It’s not clear from the drawing whether the pedestrian crossing of the NSCS is light controlled or if the traffic lights at the end of Princess Street are remaining. Might cyclists using CS7 have to wait thrice; at lights to exit Princess Street, then at the pedestrian crossing lights, then for the next phase of the pedestrian/cycle lights to cross St George’s Road? Or coming the other way have to wait for lights at the end of Elliots Row, then again for pedestrians crossing the cycling superhighway?

If the lights at the end of Princess Street are remaining there is potential conflict with cyclists on the NSCS who appear not to be traffic light controlled.

(As a complimentary measure, it would be better to relocate the pedestrian crossing on London Road instead, to the E&C side of the CS7, nearer the tube station and bus stops, to maintain the pedestrian desire line and permit cyclists to turn left from Princess Street onto the London Road bus and cycle lane.)

I suggest consideration is given to relocating the on-road directional arrows for motorists turning out of side roads across the cycling superhighway. These would be better placed in the ‘holding’ space between the traffic island segregation. I would also like conventional entrance/exit of side road lining (double/single give way) on both sides of the ‘holding’ space.

West Square – measures could be taken to make this approach to the square two-way for traffic or filtering traffic out. For the rationale see 1b, Geraldine Street.

Section 1b
With amendments there is considerable potential to increase cycling to/from Charlotte Sharman Primary School, Notre Dame Secondary School, St Jude’s Primary School, St George’s Cathedral Primary School and the Geraldine Mary Harmsworth Park (including the extensive sports facilities and Imperial War Museum) through creating a cycle crossing in conjunction with the planned pedestrian crossing at Geraldine Street.

As a quick fix, moving the Pedestrian crossing south of Geraldine Street allows cycles to cross St George’s Road into Geraldine Street (which is narrow and one-way) to access Charlotte Sharman School (cycle entrance) and the park and associated sports facilities and museum. The pedestrian crossing of the NSCS by Geraldine Street should not be light controlled.

Ideally, Geraldine Street could be pedestrianized, with two-way cycling permitted (option of a Toucan crossing of St George’s Road) so children and others can walk and cycle BOTH ways between the cycling superhighway and Geraldine Street. It also improves ease of use of the Cycle Hire docking station in Geraldine Street. Pedestrianising this street is dependent on the one-way West Square section of road off St George’s Road being made two-way, or filtering motor traffic so it can’t move between West Square and St George’s Road but must use Brook Drive instead for access/egress.

Consideration should be given to making Colnbrook and Gladstone Streets two-way for cycles

At the junction of St George’s Road and Lambeth Road, going into town, I propose removing the early start box and the dropped kerb from the cycle track into it. It would be better for cyclists turning left onto Lambeth Road to do it as though going straight on from Lambeth Road (assuming a right turn from Lambeth Road to St George’s Road is also permissible for cyclists)

I would prefer NSCH section of Lambeth Road being segregated to facilitate children cycling to and from St George’s Cathedral Primary School.

I question the need to widen the footway at this junction, but would like to see a cycle track continue across Lambeth Road westbound.

Eastbound on Lambeth Road the early start lights should not be installed. Instead of two left turn lanes, one should be straight ahead only and one should be left only. Cyclists should have green with the straight ahead lights but be able to turn left also at that time. A cycle lane installed on the continuation of St George’s Road northbound may permit left turns by cyclists at any time not prohibited by pedestrian crossing phases.

Section 2a
Dodson Street needs to be two way for cyclists, otherwise adults and children cycling have to use Bikeability level 3 (+)  Westminster Bridge Road to access it.

Westminster Bridge Road should be redesigned to be two way for cyclists. I challenge the tour bus parking being provided on arterial roads. They should either pay for private land parking or park on appropriate minor streets allowing segregated cycle tracks to be installed on the arterial roads.

Section 2b
There should be ‘in-one’ pedestrian crossings on all junctions of St George’s Circus, matched up with cycle crossings. Essentially the cycle track continuing around the perimeter of it. Currently I can’t envisage children being permitted to cycle westbound from Borough Road to Lambeth Road or vice versa with the design currently proposed.

Section 3a
I support the measures shown here, especially ones that improve the Quietway nature of Webber Street.

Section 3b
Ufford Street needs to retain cyclist entrance/exit, especially as Boundary Way is one-way.
I would like to see a better transition to the NSCS at Pocock Street.

Section 3c
Cyclists need to be permitted to turn left into The Cut.
The directional arrow for the right turn into Union Street from Blackfriars Road NSCH northbound should be a little further back so cyclists wait in ‘straight ahead’ rather than ‘left turn’ lane.
Does ped’n scramble crossing remain at The Cut / Blackfriars Rd / Union St?

Section 3d
No comment

Section 3e
The waiting areas for cyclists turning from NSCH eastbound into Southwark Street should be in the ‘going straight on’ lane, not in the left-turning lane for motor traffic as this may invite conflict at the entrance to Southwark Street.
The proposed method of turning right from Southwark Street into the NSCH isn’t clear.